Argumentation semantics of communicative action

نویسندگان

  • Hans Weigand
  • Aldo de Moor
  • H. Weigand
  • A. de Moor
چکیده

Communication is a process aimed at agreement on some situation definition. When the agreement is not immediate, a discussion is needed to resolve the points of disagreement using argumentation. Although such a discussion is recognized in the LAP approaches, no formal treatment of it has been given so far. In this paper, we introduce a formal model based on recent results from argumentation theory. It suggests some valuable norms and procedures for rational discussion that could be applied in business process support, IS design as well as in communication diagnosis. The model is further developed in confrontation with the well-known IBIS approach of Conklin. This results in a so-called 3-box model that is proposed as an extension of the Transaction Process Model of Van Reijswoud.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Syntax and Semantics of the Fatio Argumentation Protocol

Recent work in the design of agent interaction protocols has focused on applications involving dialectical argumentation — the giving and receiving of reasons for statements. Yet no widely-accepted standard set of locutions exist for such argument. Drawing on both speech act theory and the philosophy of communicative action, we first present a novel typology of speech acts for agent communicati...

متن کامل

Modelling Argumentation and Belief Revision in Agent Interactions

We describe a model for resolution of belief conflicts by argumentation in agent interactions, based on aspects of dialogic logic, speech act theory and belief systems research. This is part of a long term project on the relations between argumentation and cognitive change in collaborative problemsolving interactions. A set of communicative acts for argumentative interaction is defined, based o...

متن کامل

A Pragmatic and Semantic Unified Framework for Agent Communication

In this thesis, we propose a unified framework for the pragmatics and the semantics of agent communication. Pragmatics deals with the way agents use communicative acts when conversing. It is related to the dynamics of agent interactions and to the way of connecting individual acts while building complete conversations. Semantics is interested in the meaning of these acts. It lays down the found...

متن کامل

Analysis and Assessment of Communicative Action Indicators and Variables; a Case of Tehran city, Iran

While there are a wide variety of studies about communicative action theory of Habermas, there is the need for building of indicators and variables for quantitative methods of assessing this concept in a particular case study. Especially as the development of communicative action theory has created new perspectives in urban planning, it is necessary to assess and promote this concept in cities ...

متن کامل

Towards Characterising Argumentation Based Dialogue in the Argument Interchange Format

To facilitate development and practical deployment of argumentation systems, a recent shared notation, or Argument Interchange Format (AIF), has been proposed for representation and communication of argumentation knowledge amongst agents. The AIF is described as an abstract model, or “ontology”, characterising the core concepts and their relationships. Concrete reifications or syntaxes instanti...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004